re:constitution
2026/ 2027

Saba Brachveli

Fast-Track Authoritarianism - The Legislative Path of Democratic Erosion in Georgia (2023–2026)

A man standing straight with his arms crossed in front of a dark and patterned background. He has dark short hair and has a trimmed beared. He is also wearing glasses and a light and patterend shirt.
(c) Civil Society Foundation

Saba Brachveli is a Georgian human rights lawyer, criminal law scholar, and lecturer specializing in criminal justice, the rule of law, and democratic resilience. He serves as Human Rights Program Manager at the Civil Society Foundation and teaches criminal law at Ilia State University and the University of Georgia. Previously, he held senior positions at the Public Defender's Office of Georgia, including Deputy Head of the Criminal Justice Department, and completed a Professional Fellowship at the Atlanta Public Defender's Office in the United States. He has advised international organizations, including USAID, UNDP, IREX Europe, and the Council of Europe, on human rights, criminal justice, and civic space. Saba holds LL.M. degrees with honors from the University of Edinburgh and Tbilisi State University and was awarded the prestigious Chevening Scholarship. His current research interests include democratic resilience, constitutional democracy, civic space, and the role of criminal law in responding to democratic backsliding.

Fast-Track Authoritarianism - The Legislative Path of Democratic Erosion in Georgia (2023–2026)

Democratic backsliding increasingly occurs through formally legal mechanisms rather than overt constitutional rupture. This project examines Georgia’s rapid legislative transformation between 2023 and 2026 as a case study of authoritarian legalism. While existing scholarship has largely focused on gradual democratic erosion in countries such as Russia, Belarus, and Azerbaijan, Georgia represents an accelerated model in which restrictive legislation targeting civil society, media, political opposition, and public protest was adopted within a remarkably short period. The project argues that this case offers new insights into how democratic institutions can be dismantled through law itself. The research will combine comparative legal analysis of legislation, case law, and policy documents with semi-structured interviews involving legal scholars, human rights practitioners, journalists, and civil society representatives. It investigates whether Georgian authorities adapted legislative models from neighboring authoritarian regimes, identifies the distinctive features of Georgia’s trajectory, and assesses the implications for international human rights protection, particularly the ability of existing mechanisms to respond to rapidly evolving legislative restrictions. By conceptualizing Georgia as a case of accelerated authoritarian legalism, the project aims to contribute to comparative constitutional scholarship while providing practical recommendations for strengthening democratic resilience and developing earlier responses to fast-moving authoritarian legal change.