re:constitution
2024/ 2025

Maria Crippa

Prosecuting International Crimes against Migrants before Italian Courts: Joining Forces to Close the Accountability Gap

Maria Crippa is post-doctoral researcher at the University of Milan. She holds a PhD in Legal Studies “Cesare Beccaria” from the same University, with a thesis on the implementation of international criminal justice before domestic courts, under the supervision of Prof Chantal Meloni. In 2021, she was DAAD Scholar at the Humboldt University of Berlin. With Prof Florian Jeßberger and Prof C. Meloni, she is editor of the book “Domesticating International Criminal Law” (Routledge, 2023) and author of its chapter on crimes against humanity and genocide. She publishes extensively on international criminal law and the domestic prosecution of international crimes. She contributed to a legal consult on Italian remedies for the prosecution of international crimes for Lawyers for Justice in Libya (2022). Since 2022, Maria is tutor for the Project of excellence “International Criminal Law and Judicial Cooperation on International Crimes”, funded by the Italian Ministry of Justice and organized with the support of the University of Milan. Since 2024, she has been reviewer for the International Journal of Human Rights and evaluator at the IBA ICC Moot Court Competition. Maria is a qualified lawyer in Italy. In 2016, she interned at the Appeals Division of the International Criminal Court.

Prosecuting International Crimes against Migrants before Italian Courts: Joining Forces to Close the Accountability Gap 

This research focuses on the prosecution of international crimes against migrants in the Italian jurisdiction and evaluates the effect of cooperation between national and international actors on the outcomes of the prosecution itself.
The first part of the project focuses on the Italian case study. The presence of migrants from the Central Mediterranean triggers domestic extraterritorial jurisdiction on conducts committed in Libya or on the migration route. The analysis aims to investigate the potential of Italian proceedings in closing the accountability gap. Relevant case law seems to indicate that these trials mostly stem from migration cases, thus failing to prosecute high-profile defendants. Moreover, the absence of international criminal law provisions determines severe setbacks regarding, for instance, definition of crimes and statutory limitations.
The second part of the project employs empirical research on the successful strategies adopted by other jurisdictions in prosecuting international crimes. Furthermore, it focuses on the cooperation between national actors and international organizations on investigations into crimes against migrants.
Against this backdrop, the research shall develop a feasible strategy for granting the utmost success to Italian proceedings on international crimes against migrants, assessing the applicability of approaches developed in foreign jurisdictions and improving synergies between Italian prosecutors and international stakeholders.