re:constitution
2020/ 2021

Aravind Ganesh

Mobility Phase: Universität Bayreuth | University of Hamburg

Commodification, Climate Change, and Sovereignty

Aravind Ganesh is the Vice-Chancellor’s Research Fellow in Law at Oxford Brookes University, and his research interests lie in EU law, public international law, private law theory, and the legal and political philosophy of Immanuel Kant. He obtained a PhD (cum laude) from the Faculty of Law, VU Amsterdam in June 2019, and also possesses degrees from King’s College London (LL.B.), Columbia Law School (JD), and Oxford (BCL). Before joining Brookes, Aravind worked for four years as a Research Fellow at the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for Procedural Law. His work experience also includes working for the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, practising as a Corporate Lawyer in New York, as well as volunteering in South Africa in a major civil rights organization. Aravind has held visiting fellowships at Université Catholique de Louvain (2009-2010) and Tel Aviv University (2014-2015), and his work has been published in journals such as Legal Theory and the Michigan Journal of International Law. A monograph based on his PhD thesis is forthcoming in March 2021 within the series Law and Practical Reason under the Hart/Bloomsbury imprint.

Commodification, Climate Change, and Sovereignty

European politics is beset by two seemingly divergent crises of liberal democracy and climate change. On the one hand, resurgent authoritarian movements cast climate change as a hoax and environmental movements as elite cosmopolitan plots against national freedoms and prosperity. At the same time, we also see the rise of far-right, 'ecofascist' movements that accept the fact of climate change, but as grounds for mortal civilisational combat, which then finds political expression in a demand for the expulsion of migrants – often themselves the victims of environmental collapse. My hypothesis is that a significant part of this malaise is caused by ‘commodifying’ the environment. This rests upon a deeper commodification of the public sphere itself, such that sovereignty is imagined as an office of ‘dominion,’ and the rights of refugees as claims to an equitable share of the earth’s land and resources as if these were fungible commodities to be bought and sold. In contrast, I argue, relying upon Kant’s philosophy of right, that the environment and the relevant sovereign obligations should be conceived as the inalienable ‘body’ of the political community, and the climate change refugee’s most basic right as one of membership in a political community.