EUME
2022/ 2023

Eman Elnemr

Discourse of Public Morals in Egypt 1880-1945: Modernization, Social Rebellion, and Licentiousness (khala‘a)

Previous Fellowships: 2021/ 2022

received her PhD in modern and contemporary history (2017) from the University of Tanta, Egypt, for her dissertation entitled “Family Businesses in Egypt 1920-1961,” and her MA (2012) for the thesis “The History of Egyptian Theatre and Its Impact on Society (1869-1920).” She published her first book, Egyptian Theatre from the Renaissance to the Revolution of 1919 in 2019 with Dar al-Kutub wa al-Watha’iq al-Qawmiya. Her research interests address hegemonic elite projects and so-called modernization transformations, their effects on society, modes of resistance or responses to them, and public/people’s interventions in shaping them. More specifically, she is concerned with the daily practices of various forms and practices of art and expression that are linked to the transformation of the political economy and modernization, including the discourse-making mechanisms that par-take in is construction. Besides that, she is working to finish her second book (tentatively titled “Family, Money, and Power in Egypt 1920-1961”). In the academic year 2021/22, she was a EUME Fellow and remains affiliated with EUME in the academic year 2022/23. 

2022/2023

Discourse of Public Morals in Egypt 1880-1945: Modernization, Social Rebellion, and Licentiousness (khala‘a

Al-Khala‘a, translated as licentiousness or obscenity practiced by women, calls for a critical interrogation as a problematic concept that obscures violence and, at the same time, involves rebellion and desire. Contemporary Egyptians whose knowledge of history is based on school education and mainstream historiography are often unaware of the rather licentious heritage of Egyptian and Arabic culture and arts. The conservative moral codes of moderate and decent behaviour that today are widely taken for granted, are a modernist accomplishment that was produced and formulated under the conditions of colonial modernity in Egypt during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. In the proposed research project, I ask how this selective appropriation of Islamic and other ethical traditions as well as European ideas and practices was accomplished. The main research question of my project is how these ideas of public morals and religious, national or Oriental traditions were formulated in early 20th century Egypt, and what kind of ethical theories they were based on. I specifically inquire how the idea of morals and traditions was formulated 1) through a selective appropriation of Aristotelian ethics and 2) in a polemical encounter with popular arts that were labelled as licentious.

Licentiousness (khala‘a) and the Modernizing of Egypt

Al-Khala‘a, translated as licentiousness or obscenity practiced by women, calls for a critical interrogation as a problematic concept that obscures violence and at the same time involves rebellion and desire. It is, therefore, necessary to understand the historical legacies that have shaped the concept in its strongly normative (pejorative) use in public discourse, daily conduct, and religious and political power today.
The noun khala’a and the adjective khali‘ are derived from the Arabic verb khala‘ which means taking away, letting go, undressing, releasing. In modern use, khala‘a and khali‘ carry a variety of connotations, the foremost of which is the call to debauchery and sex trade. My research project focuses on practices of licentiousness (khala‘a), starting from the assumption that it is a concept and a practice open to many interpretations, including defensive ploys and rebellion against patriarchal structures, whether social, religious, or political. It examines whether these practices can be understood as anti-bourgeois modernization, a space that enhances the possibilities for solidarity among people of different class, gender and religion.