Prisma Ukraïna
2020/ 2021

Bohdan Tokarsky

Ukraine’s Executed Renaissance: Fragmentation of the Literary Self in Early Soviet Culture

Bohdan Tokarsky is an Affiliated Lecturer in Ukrainian Studies at the University of Cambridge, where he has recently completed his PhD. His doctoral thesis is an innovative study of the works of one of Ukraine’s most sophisticated twentieth-century poets, Vasyl Stus (1938–1985). Bohdan specialises in nineteenth- and twentieth-century Ukrainian literature and culture, with a particular interest in Ukrainian modernism, the shaping of identities and the interplay between poetry and philosophy. Before coming to Cambridge, Bohdan was trained in International Law. He holds LLB and LLM degrees from the Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. At Cambridge, Bohdan has been a proactive force behind Cambridge Ukrainian Studies, and has organised a number of impactful cultural events. Bohdan is also the co-author of The Summer Before Everything, a powerful verbatim play on revolution and war in Ukraine, based on numerous interviews with soldiers, internally displaced persons, and volunteers all over the country, which was professionally produced at the 2016 Hotbed Festival at Cambridge Junction. Most recently, he co-organised the Kharkiv International Theatre Festival ‘1919-2019: Kulish. Kurbas. Shakespeare’, which staged fresh productions of central dramatic works of Ukrainian modernism.
 

Ukraine’s Executed Renaissance: Fragmentation of the Literary Self in Early Soviet Culture

Bohdan’s project explores the fragmentation of subjectivity in Soviet Ukrainian modernist works of the 1920s and the early 1930s. The writers and artists of this generation (the ‘Executed Renaissance’) were not only physically exterminated en masse during Stalin’s Great Terror; they were also culturally and intellectually effaced for decades. Ukrainian modernism reflected the mutable political landscape and identity confusion of the 1920s-30s in the Soviet Union. Bohdan investigates how Ukrainian modernist texts articulate multiple and overlapping identities: national, Soviet, Communist, subjective. Through the analysis of literary works and other published and archive materials, he scrutinises the authors’ strategies in subverting the imposed unitary self-image of the Soviet regime and the construction instead of multiple identities. Ukrainian literature provides a fascinating case study, where the formal characteristics of modernist writing are inextricably linked with considerations of nation-building and the competition between nationalist and socialist projects. While Ukraine can serve as a prism for the study of the dynamics of nationalism and competing identities, the Ukrainian modernist literature of the 1920s and the 1930s is a prism of a kind too, one that reveals the shifting political identities in early Soviet culture and twentieth-century Ukraine.